Determinants of Conversion From Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy: Türkiye Case

dc.contributor.authorAslan, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorCirakli, Umit
dc.contributor.authorOzden, Sabri
dc.contributor.authorCetin, Emine
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-20T09:50:28Z
dc.date.available2025-03-20T09:50:28Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİzmir Bakırçay Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics of patients who required conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. In addition, we compared the health outcomes of laparoscopic and converted cholecystectomy. Methods: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study. The laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures performed in hospitals of the Turkish Ministry of Health in 2016 were examined. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyze the data. Results: There were 103,387 laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Of these, 102,294 (98.9%) were laparoscopically completed, whereas 1,093 (1.1%) were converted to open cholecystectomy. The majority (75.9%) of the patients were female. The rate of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy; in men >= 65 years of age, patients with chronic renal failure, hypertension, diabetes, malign neoplasm, and cerebrovascular disease were found to be statistically significantly higher than those in the opposing groups. Mortality, complications, intensive care unit treatment rates, and average hospitalization time were found to be statistically significant in cholecystectomy converted to open surgery. Conclusion: Patients who had converted cholecystectomy had more negative health outcomes than those who had completed the procedure laparoscopically. Old age, being male, and having comorbidities and malignancies increase the risk of conversion to open cholecystectomy. These factors can help determine the conversion risk of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to an open procedure.
dc.description.sponsorshipFinancial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/BMJ.galenos.2023.2023.1-18
dc.identifier.endpage96
dc.identifier.issn1305-9319
dc.identifier.issn1305-9327
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85197255116
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage92
dc.identifier.trdizinid1273527
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/BMJ.galenos.2023.2023.1-18
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1273527
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14034/2214
dc.identifier.volume20
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001274401700001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGalenos Publ House
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Journal of Bakirkoy
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250319
dc.subjectCholecystectomy
dc.subjectconversion
dc.subjectlaparoscopic cholecystectomy
dc.subjectrisk factors
dc.titleDeterminants of Conversion From Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy: Türkiye Case
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar