The effect of right conventional radial artery access site and left distal radial artery access site on quality of life in coronary angiography: Which route is more appropriate?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorDuygu, Hamza
dc.contributor.authorŞenöz, Oktay
dc.contributor.authorKış, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T19:48:18Z
dc.date.available2023-03-22T19:48:18Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentBelirleneceken_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: There are not many studies comparing the right conventional and left distal radial (anatomical snuffbox) access in coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in terms of patient satisfaction and complications; therefore, in this study, we planned to compare these two approaches and determine the ideal radial access site for the patients. Patients and methods: A total of 120 patients (80 males, 40 females; mean age: 59.2±11.7 years; range, 18 to 90 years) who underwent CAG or PCI via the radial artery between February 2022 and April 2022 were included in the prospective observational study. The patients were divided into right conventional radial artery access (Group 1; n=68) and left distal radial artery (access (Group 2; n=52) groups. Results: The rate of minor bleeding was higher in the right conventional access group compared to the left distal access group (16.2% vs. 3.8%; p=0.031). Major bleeding, hand ischemia, and radial artery occlusion were not observed in the study population. The rate of patients who had pain that disrupts daily activities was statistically higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (17.6% vs. 5.8%). The patients in Group 2 were more satisfied with the transradial CAG/PCI compared to Group 1 (94.3% vs. 66.2%; p=0.001). Conclusion: Left distal radial artery access from the anatomic snuffbox was a safer method than right conventional radial artery access for CAG or PCI. Patients were more satisfied with the left distal radial access than the right conventional radial access.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5606/e-cvsi.2022.1328
dc.identifier.endpage88en_US
dc.identifier.issn2148-9211
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage81en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid534639en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14034/1052
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5606/e-cvsi.2022.1328
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/534639
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.journalCardiovascular surgery and interventionsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleThe effect of right conventional radial artery access site and left distal radial artery access site on quality of life in coronary angiography: Which route is more appropriate?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
o. şenöz.pdf
Boyut:
182.42 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam metin / Full text
İndir

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Öksüz Yayınları