Efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation on patients with non-cystic bronchiectasis according to disease severity

dc.authoridDeniz, Sami/0000-0002-8328-295X
dc.authoridDeniz, Sami/0000-0002-8328-295X
dc.authoridErbaycu, Ahmet Emin/0000-0001-6618-6774
dc.authorwosidDeniz, Sami/AFQ-4536-2022
dc.authorwosidDeniz, Sami/C-7632-2014
dc.authorwosidErbaycu, Ahmet Emin/K-2948-2017
dc.contributor.authorDeniz, Sami
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Hulya
dc.contributor.authorErbaycu, Ahmet Emin
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-09T18:48:51Z
dc.date.available2024-03-09T18:48:51Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİzmir Bakırçay Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The European Respiratory Society guidelines support pulmo-nary rehabilitation (PR) in bronchiectasis through high-quality evidence. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PR on bronchiectasis patients accor-ding to disease severity assessed by the Bronchiectasis Severity Index (BSI). Materials and Methods: This prospective study included patients with stable bronchiectasis. Demographic data of all patients were questioned. All patients underwent an 8-week PR program. The patients were grouped into three according to disease severity (mild, moderate and severe) based on their BSI scores. The following parameters were evaluated at baseline (pre-PR) and after PR (post-PR): pulmonary function test results, carbon monoxide diffusion capacity, body mass index, exercise capacity (6-minute walking test), quality of life (QoL; St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression scores. Results: The study included 69 patients (55 males; mean age, 62.6 +/- 9 years). After PR, the patients were observed to have significantly improved QoL and exercise capacity (p< 0.05). According to BSI, 16 (23.2%), 29 (42.0%), and 24 (34.8%) patients had mild, moderate, and severe bronchiectasis, respecti-vely. These patient groups significantly differed regarding age, exercise capa-city, and QoL (p 0.05). Comparing the change between post-PR and pre-PR values of the study parameters (increment = post-PR value -pre-PR value), no signifi-cant differences were observed regarding the exercise capacity and QoL (p 0.05) in the groups. Conclusion: PR increases exercise capacity and QoL in bronchiectasis patients, and its efficacy does not differ according to disease severity. Thus, appropriate bronchiectasis patients should be referred to PR program regardless of disease severity.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5578/tt.20219602
dc.identifier.endpage457en_US
dc.identifier.issn0494-1373
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34957738en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85121764693en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage449en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid511005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5578/tt.20219602
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/511005
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14034/1509
dc.identifier.volume69en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000753856800002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Assoc Tuberculosis & Thoraxen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTuberkuloz Ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thoraxen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBronchiectasis; Pulmonary Rehabilitation; Bronchiectasis Severity Indexen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation on patients with non-cystic bronchiectasis according to disease severityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
15097.pdf
Boyut:
114.57 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format