Development of the psychiatric nursing course evaluation form and a validity-reliability study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKacmaz, Elif Deniz
dc.contributor.authorArabaci, Leyla Baysan
dc.contributor.authorBaysan, Caner
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-09T18:48:43Z
dc.date.available2024-03-09T18:48:43Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİzmir Bakırçay Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of the study is to develop the evaluation form for the psychiatric nursing course and to examine its validity and reliability.Methods: The methodologically designed study involved 272 undergraduate nursing students voluntarily participating in the theory and practice of psychiatric nursing course, out of a total enrollment of 375 students, during the period from April to July 2021. Data were collected through the descriptive information form and psychiatric nursing course evaluation form (PNCEF) developed by the researchers. The data analysis employed SPSS-25 and AMOS-21 software packages. In the validity evaluation of the scale, content validity, construct validity, in reliability evaluation, internal consistency analyzes were performed.Results: 80.5% of the students were women, 76.1% of them took the theory of psychiatric nursing, 81.3% of them took the practice online (remotely), and only 28.7% of them stated that they gave nursing care to an individual with a psy-chiatric disorder. After the candidate items (57 items) of the PNCEF were evaluated by experts, 9 items were removed and the content validity index (CGI ) of the items was found to be 0.91. In construct validity evaluation, the form was factorable (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin=0.974), the scale confirmed the single-factor structure according to explanatory factor analysis, and factor loads were between 0.67 and 0.86. Split half Spearman-Brown reliability coefficient was 0.956. In-ternal consistency Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was 0.986 and 0.986. Item test correlation values were found to be between 0.546 and 0.840. As a result of the fit analysis, it was calculated as CFI=0.849, TLI=0.839, RMSEA=0.095, and Chi-square/df=3.452.Conclusion: Following meticulous analyses, the conclusive version of the 43-item form demonstrated robust content and construct validity, quasi-test reliability, and internal consistency measured by Cronbach's alpha. These findings affirm the form's status as a valid and reliable instrument, adept at assessing student nurses'perceptions within the undergraduate program concerning both theoretical and practical accomplishments in the mental health and psychiatric nursing course.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/phd.2023.57614
dc.identifier.endpage342en_US
dc.identifier.issn2149-374X
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85179368137en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage335en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/phd.2023.57614
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14034/1431
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001127674100012en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKare Publen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Psychiatric Nursingen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPsychiatric Nursing; Reliability And Validity; Scaleen_US
dc.titleDevelopment of the psychiatric nursing course evaluation form and a validity-reliability studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
1431.pdf
Boyut:
495.18 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu