Incivility, Mobbing, and Abusive Supervision: A Tripartite Scale Development Study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridGONCU-KOSE, ASLI/0000-0001-7740-7958
dc.authoridToker-Gultas, Yonca/0000-0002-0177-0301
dc.authoridACAR, FERIDE PINAR/0000-0002-2874-2511
dc.contributor.authorSumer, H. Canan
dc.contributor.authorGoncu-Kose, Asli
dc.contributor.authorToker-Gultas, Yonca
dc.contributor.authorAcar, F. Pinar
dc.contributor.authorKaranfil, Derya
dc.contributor.authorOk, A. Basak
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-20T09:51:04Z
dc.date.available2025-03-20T09:51:04Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİzmir Bakırçay Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractUsing qualitative and quantitative methodologies, in three consecutive studies with employed samples, we developed measures of workplace incivility, mobbing, and abusive supervision sensitive to the nuances of a non-Western context (i.e., Turkiye). In Study 1, we first conducted 15 focus groups (N = 149), identified culture-specific and universal themes underlying the focal mistreatment types, and developed the initial scales. We then pilot-tested (N = 427) and refined the scales using exploratory factor analytic procedures. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analyses (N range = 456-524) and associations between the new scales and their widely used counterparts (N = 353) yielded evidence for the construct validity of the scales. Study 2 also involved the development of short forms of relatively long incivility and abusive supervision scales. In Study 3 (N = 482), we first examined the extent to which the three scales were operationally distinct. Second, we examined the scales' ability to predict burnout and organizational commitment. Results supported operational distinctiveness as well as the criterion-related validity of the scales. A dominance analysis revealed that the three scales had equivalent contributions in explaining the two outcome variables, further justifying their distinctiveness. We argue that the use of present scales is not necessarily restricted to the Turkish context and may prove useful more broadly in other neo-traditional contexts.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00223980.2024.2321881
dc.identifier.endpage457
dc.identifier.issn0022-3980
dc.identifier.issn1940-1019
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pmid38483977
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85188292954
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage428
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2024.2321881
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14034/2390
dc.identifier.volume158
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001184155800001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Psychology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250319
dc.subjectScale development
dc.subjectworkplace incivility
dc.subjectmobbing
dc.subjectabusive supervision
dc.subjectneo-traditional
dc.subjectTurkey
dc.subjectmeasurement
dc.subjectpersonnel
dc.subjectwell-being
dc.titleIncivility, Mobbing, and Abusive Supervision: A Tripartite Scale Development Study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu