Retrospective comparison of open and percutaneous repair methods in acute achilles- tendon repair

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKılıç, Ali İhsan
dc.contributor.authorAkdemir, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorTuran, Ahmet Cemil
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T19:48:04Z
dc.date.available2023-03-22T19:48:04Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentBelirleneceken_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: In recent years Achilles’ tendon tears are becoming more common. Open and percutaneous repair methods have been described in the surgical treatment of tendon tears. The aim of this study is to determine whether there is a difference between open repair and percutaneous repair. Methods: Patients who underwent surgical repair due to acute Achilles’ tendon full-thickness rupture in our clinic, were included in the study. Open repair was performed for one group of patients and percutaneous repair was performed for the other. At the end of follow-up, clinical scores and complication rates were compared statistically. Results: Thirty-six patients with a mean age of 46.3 years were included in the study. Nineteen patients were treated with the open method and seventeen patients with the percutaneous method. The mean follow-up period was 27.3 months for both groups. Mean Leppilahti scores were 94.71 in the percutaneous repair group and 90.79 in the open repair group (p>0.05). Re-rupture, deep infection and DVT rates were similar (p>0.05). Skin necrosis was more common in the open repair group (p<0.05). While sural nerve neuropraxia was more common in percutaneous repair (p<0.05). Conclusion: In the surgical treatment of acute Achilles’ tendon tears, the percutaneous method should be the first choice with its low complication rate and good clinical results. It is necessary to pay attention to the sural nerve during surgery.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.31067/acusaglik.1092407
dc.identifier.endpage513en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-470X
dc.identifier.issn1309-5994
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage508en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1129307en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14034/966
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.31067/acusaglik.1092407
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1129307
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.journalAcıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAchilles’ tendonen_US
dc.subjectopen repairen_US
dc.subjectpercutaneous repairen_US
dc.subjectsural nerveen_US
dc.subjectskin necrosisen_US
dc.titleRetrospective comparison of open and percutaneous repair methods in acute achilles- tendon repairen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Characterıstıc patterns and publıcatıon rates of spıne specıalty theses from postgraduate orthopedıc resıdency (2001-2020) programmes ın Turkey.pdf
Boyut:
1.49 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam metin / Full text
İndir

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu