Resistive Warming Mattress, Forced-Air Warming System, or a Combination of the Two in the Prevention of Intraoperative Inadvertent Hypothermia: A Randomized Trial

dc.authoridkurt, cengizhan/0000-0001-6395-5443
dc.authoridOkgun Alcan, Aliye/0000-0002-6889-363X
dc.authoridAygun, Hakan/0000-0002-6152-0857
dc.authorwosidkurt, cengizhan/ADD-2860-2022
dc.contributor.authorAlcan, Aliye Okgun
dc.contributor.authorAygun, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorKurt, Cengizhan
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-09T18:48:22Z
dc.date.available2024-03-09T18:48:22Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİzmir Bakırçay Üniversitesien_US
dc.description4th International, 12th National Congress of Turkish Surgical and Operating Room Nurses -- JAN 13-16, 2022 -- Antalya, TURKEYen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To prevent intraoperative inadvertent hypothermia (IIH), resistive products and forced-air warming systems are often used simultaneously. There is insufficient evidence to show whether this application is clinically more effective than a single active warming device. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy a single intraoperative active warming method with combined methods in IIH prevention.Design: A randomized, prospective, experimental study.Methods: This study was conducted between June and October 2021 in the operating room of a training and research hospital. The study sample consisted of 123 patients who underwent scheduled orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia, were young (18-64), and had an ASA risk score of I to III. The patients were divided into three groups preoperatively according to the stratified randomization technique. To prevent IIH, a resis-tive warming mattress was used in group 1; a forced-air warming system was used in group 2; and a combi-nation of the two methods were used in group 3. The body temperatures of the patients were measured and recorded every 15 minutes from admission to the operating room until the end of surgery.Findings: The mean intraoperative body temperature of the patients was 36.6 & PLUSMN;0.15 & DEG;C for group 1; 36.6 & PLUSMN;0.1 & DEG;C for Group 2 and 36.6 & PLUSMN; 0.15 & DEG;C for Group 3. There was no difference between the groups in terms of body tem-perature. The overall incidence of IIH was 8.1%; 9.8% in group 1, 9.8% in group 2 and 4.9% in group 3. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of IIH (p < .05).Conclusions: This study supports the efficacy of using resistive warming mattress and forced-air warming sys-tems in preventing IIH. The use of both methods together made no difference in terms of IIH development.& COPY; 2022 American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jopan.2022.11.007
dc.identifier.endpage615en_US
dc.identifier.issn1089-9472
dc.identifier.issn1532-8473
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37031060en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85151625736en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage611en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2022.11.007
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14034/1309
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001052862800001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Perianesthesia Nursingen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectInadvertent Hypothermia; Active Warming; Intraoperativeen_US
dc.titleResistive Warming Mattress, Forced-Air Warming System, or a Combination of the Two in the Prevention of Intraoperative Inadvertent Hypothermia: A Randomized Trialen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
1309.pdf
Boyut:
520.78 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format