The Bear Hug Test Improves Sensitivity Compared With the Belly Press Test for Identifying Subscapularis Tendon Tears, but Both Tests Miss the Majority of Partial Tears

dc.authorscopusid57218698951
dc.authorscopusid57218855753
dc.authorscopusid58100314600
dc.authorscopusid55600055100
dc.authorscopusid12777973900
dc.contributor.authorKilic A.I.
dc.contributor.authorArdebol J.
dc.contributor.authorPak T.
dc.contributor.authorMenendez M.E.
dc.contributor.authorDenard P.J.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-09T19:39:56Z
dc.date.available2024-03-09T19:39:56Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİzmir Bakırçay Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To investigate the performance of the bear hug (BH) and belly press (BP) tests in diagnosing tears of the subscapularis (SSC). Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on prospectively maintained data on patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) of SSC tears between 2011 and 2021. A control group also was obtained of ARCRs with an intact SSC tendon. All examinations and ARCRs were performed by one high-volume shoulder surgeon. The BH test and BP test results were compared with arthroscopic findings as the gold-standard diagnostic modality. Tear type was classified based on the Lafosse classification. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, false-positive and false-negative rates, and accuracy were calculated for both tests. Results: A total of 1,122 patients were included for analysis, 866 with intraoperatively confirmed SSC tears (77%) and 256 without (23%). The BH test diagnosed SSC tears with a sensitivity of 46.1% and a specificity of 83.2%, whereas the BP test diagnosed tears with a sensitivity of 23.3% and a specificity of 93.4%. Overall, both tests missed SSC tears in 42.3% (n = 475) of cases. The BH test had accuracy rates of 25.9% for SSC type I tear, 48.7% for type II tear, 65% for type III tear, and 81.7% for type IV-V tear. In contrast, the BP test had accuracy rates of 7.6% for type I tear, 14.7% for type II tear, 42% for type III tear, and 68.7% for type IV-V tear. Conclusions: The BH test had greater sensitivity than the BP test in identifying SSC tears. Both tests showed low accuracy in identifying SSC tears as tear size decreased. Combining both tests did not provide any additional benefits over using the BH test alone. Level of Evidence: Level III, diagnostic study. © 2023en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipArthrexen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: M.E.M. is a consultant for Arthrex. P.J.D is a consultant for Arthrex. All other authors (A.I.K., J.A., T.P.) declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100830
dc.identifier.issn2666-061X
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85178119600en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100830
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14034/1577
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofArthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectadult; arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; article; controlled study; diagnosis; diagnostic test accuracy study; female; human; lacrimal fluid; major clinical study; male; middle aged; predictive value; retrospective study; tendonen_US
dc.titleThe Bear Hug Test Improves Sensitivity Compared With the Belly Press Test for Identifying Subscapularis Tendon Tears, but Both Tests Miss the Majority of Partial Tearsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
1577.pdf
Boyut:
327.34 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format