Which Intervention Method Should be Chosen for Superficial Femoral Artery Balloon Angioplasty: Antegrade or Retrograde? A Single-Centre Experience

dc.contributor.authorKeles, Ercan
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-20T09:41:24Z
dc.date.available2025-03-20T09:41:24Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİzmir Bakırçay Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To determine which method is preferable for intervention in superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions and has a lower risk of complications. Materials and Methods: During the first six months of 2021, 153 patients undergoing peripheral angiography for an arterial origin were retrospectively reviewed. Thus, 97 peripheral angiographic procedures in 82 patients were included in this study. Complications after the procedure were evaluated. Results: The median age of the patients was 62 years (interquartile range 41-89 years). Ninety-seven procedures were performed: 37.1% were antegrade procedures and 62.9% were retrograde procedures. There was no significant difference in patients who underwent surgery on both legs in terms of chronic disease (p>0.05). Dissection was observed in 3 patients undergoing antegrade SFA procedures. Although retrograde procedures were performed more frequently, no flow-restricting dissection was observed. Hematomas formed after angioplasty in 5 patients who underwent antegrade procedures. An arteriovenous (AV) fistula developed in 2 patients. AV no fistula was observed in patients who underwent retrograde surgery. However, four patients had pseudoaneurysms and two patients had hematomas. In all these patients, puncture was performed below the gastrocnemius muscle. No hematoma or pseudoaneurysm was observed in any of the patients operated on over the gastrocnemius muscle. In both procedures, dissection was higher in patients with occlusion than in those without occlusion, which was statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: Because retrograde procedures are performed against the direction of flow, it was observed that the flap was mostly closed in controls even if dissection occurred. Retrograde puncture via the gastrocnemius muscle may reduce the incidence of hematoma and pseudoaneurysms. The reason for not seeing fistulas in retrograde punctures could be the effective use of ultrasonography in this area. Retrograde intervention might be preferable in this case, especially because dissection is more common in occlusions.
dc.identifier.doi10.32596/ejcm.galenos.2023.2021-12-067
dc.identifier.endpage100
dc.identifier.issn2147-1924
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage96
dc.identifier.trdizinid1263117
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.32596/ejcm.galenos.2023.2021-12-067
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1263117
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14034/1950
dc.identifier.volume11
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.institutionauthorKeles, Ercan
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofE Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_TR_20250319
dc.subjectAntegrade
dc.subjectretrograde
dc.subjectballoon angioplasty
dc.titleWhich Intervention Method Should be Chosen for Superficial Femoral Artery Balloon Angioplasty: Antegrade or Retrograde? A Single-Centre Experience
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar