Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos on Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head: An Analysis of Content, Reliability, and Educational Value

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKılıc, Ali Ihsan
dc.contributor.authorSayer, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorAkdemir, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-20T09:41:22Z
dc.date.available2025-03-20T09:41:22Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİzmir Bakırçay Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractAim: Videos related to avascular necrosis of the femoral head are no exception, and so the aim of this study is to evaluate the educational quality of YouTube videos on this topic. Material and Method: A standardized video search was performed on YouTube using the terms “avascular necrosis of the hip”, “osteonecrosis of the hip” and “avascular necrosis of the femoral head”. The top 50 videos were then analyzed, and the characteristics and content of the videos were recorded. The Journal of American Medical Association criteria, The DISCERN score, The Global Quality Score and the new YouTube ‘Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head Score” were all used to assess the reliability and accuracy of the videos. Results: The median video duration of the 50 videos was 10.85±19.17 minutes. The median number of views was 10,866 (range 221 to 278,174). According to the video content, 60% of the videos contained information about the disease, 10% were about patient experience, and the remaining 30% related to surgical technique or approach. Physicians were the primary uploader on YouTube for this topic. The rate of low-quality videos was determined as following according to the different evaluative systems: 68% according to the newly defined YouTube Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head Score, 60% according to the DISCERN score, and 56% according to The Global Quality Score. The Journal of the American Medical Association, The Global Quality Score, and DISCERN score were significantly correlated with video duration, while the New YouTube Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head Score was significantly correlated with video duration, time since upload, number of views, and like rate. Conclusion: Most of the popular YouTube videos about avascular necrosis are of a low quality.
dc.identifier.doi10.37990/medr.1403917
dc.identifier.endpage106
dc.identifier.issn2687-4555
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage102
dc.identifier.trdizinid1260025
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1403917
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1260025
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14034/1935
dc.identifier.volume6
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofMedical records-international medical journal (Online)
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_TR_20250319
dc.subjectYouTube
dc.subjectSocial Media
dc.subjectAvascular Necrosis
dc.subjectFemoral Head
dc.titleQuality Assessment of YouTube Videos on Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head: An Analysis of Content, Reliability, and Educational Value
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
230.4 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu