Berktaş, MustafaKayral, İbrahim HalilGüdük, Özden2022-02-152022-02-1520181309-0712https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14034/146https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2018.473https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/305856The aim of this study; to find out which standard for institutional accreditation ismore appropriate for external evaluation organizations for healthcare institutions. Dataobtained from ISQua: Guidelines and Standards for External Evaluation Organizations4th Edition Version 1.2 and ISO: Managing for the sustained success of an organization– A quality management approach.In this study; two sets of standards that organizations can use as guide to increasetheir institutional quality were evaluated to find out which one is the best choice forExternal Evaluation Organizations for health care. Other quality systems and standardsets were not evaluated in this study.First, the ISO standard set was examined in detail, then it was sought whetherthere is a matching standard or requirement in the ISQua standard set with each standardfound in the ISO standard set.It was evaluated whether the sets had superiority orweakness against each other. ISQua: Guidelines and Standards for External EvaluationOrganizations were found as more suitable for external evaluation organizations forhealthcare institutions.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessİktisatİşletmeWhich standards are more effective for healthcare external evaluation organizations management systems?: ISQua 4th Ed. vs ISO 9004:2009Article10.20491/isarder.2018.473103271281305856