Kuyubaşi S.N.Arif G.O.K.Inal S.Urtekin L.Üzümcügil A.O.Kurt C.Kiliç A.I.2024-03-092024-03-0920230219-5194https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219519423500495https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14034/1601In this study, the biomechanical behavior of three different screw materials (Ti6Al4V, Magnesium AZ91 and Ti6Al4V-HA) was analyzed to fix the femoral neck fracture with triangular fixation under axial loading and it was investigated which material was better biomechanically. Geomagic Studio and SolidWorks software were used for three-dimensional (3D) process. The triangle configuration was preferred for femoral neck fracture. The computer-aided numerical analyses were carried out in AnsysWorkbench for two different materials. We believe that the fixation materials investigated may have a role in taking patients away from recurrent anesthesia and orthopaedic surgical risks. © World Scientific Publishing Company.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessbiomechanics; Femoral neck fracture; finite element analysis; magnesium screwAluminum alloys; Biomechanics; Bone; Computer aided analysis; Finite element method; Fracture; Screws; Titanium alloys; 3D process; Axial loading; Biomechanical behavior; Biomechanical performance; Femoral neck fracture; Finite element analyse; Geomagic studios; Magnesium AZ91; Magnesium screw; Solidworks software; MagnesiumConference Object10.1142/S021951942350049523102-s2.0-85165873310Q4