Olçar, Hacı AliAkbuğa, Gökçen AydınUlutürk, SametDoğan, Şenay ArasKorkmaz, MuratKorkmaz, İrem Nisa2025-03-212025-03-2120232146-40062148-2438https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14034/2815https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/bozoktip/issue/81373/1405262Objective: This study aims to evaluate the CHAT GPT-4 artificial intelligence responses to common problems experienced by patients after hip replacement surgery using expert opinion. Material and Methods: The study used an 11-question form developed by the researcher from a literature review of the information needs of patients after hip replacement surgery. Ten orthopaedic specialists rated the accuracy of the responses generated by Chat GPT-4 using a 5-point Likert scale (5: strongly agree, 1: strongly disagree).The maximum score that can be obtained from the rating scale is 55, and the minimum score is 11. The scores are summarised using descriptive statistics. Results: All of the experts agreed that the artificial intelligence (AI) correctly answered the signs of wound infection (4.80±0.42), practices to prevent home accidents (4.50±0.52), and in which cases a doctor should be consulted (4.50±0.52). Half of the experts report that the artificial intelligence answered the question (Antithrombotic treatment time) portially true/false. For the question (Will my hip replacement dislocate?) 60 % of the experts report that the artificial intelligence answered partially true/false. Conclusion: When Chat GPT-4 was evaluated by experts, it was found to provide mostly accurate information. However, it is thought that it may be more limited in individualised treatment and care practices. More research is needed to confirm the accuracy of the results.trinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEVALUATION OF THE CHATGPT-4 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESPONSE TO THE PROBLEMS OF HIP REPLACEMENTCHAT GPT-4 Yapay Zekanın Kalça Protezi Sorunlarına CevabınınDeğerlendirilmesiEVALUATION OF THE CHATGPT-4 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESPONSE TO THE PROBLEMS OF HIP REPLACEMENT CHAT GPT-4 Yapay Zekanın Kalça Protezi Sorunlarına Cevabının DeğerlendirilmesiArticle134118122