Informed consent in surgical practice with patients' experiences: A cross-sectional study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid57201979329
dc.authorscopusid56326674500
dc.authorscopusid58477996500
dc.authorscopusid56993577900
dc.contributor.authorKumru S.
dc.contributor.authorYigit P.
dc.contributor.authorDemirtas M.
dc.contributor.authorFindik H.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-09T19:40:01Z
dc.date.available2024-03-09T19:40:01Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİzmir Bakırçay Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to evaluate patients' experiences and perspectives regarding informed consent in surgical practice. Data for this cross-sectional study were collected from 276 patients using a questionnaire developed by Falagas et al. Descriptive statistics were employed for all questions. Statistical tests such as the Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman's rank correlation analysis were performed, and Cohen's effect sizes were reported. IBM SPSS 23.0 was used for all analyses, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. A high score on both The Delivered Information Index and The Patient-Physician Index represents a positive informed consent process. Among the participants, 65.2% indicated that they understood all parts of the consent form. Of all patients, 92.8% reported that information about the specific surgical procedure was provided by physicians. However, 47.5% of the patients reported that they did not feel comfortable with their surgeons. The mean score of the Delivered Information Index was 5.63 (2.38). The mean patient-physician relationship score was 14.38 (3.31). There was a moderate positive correlation between the delivered information index and the patient-physician relationship (r=0.50; p<0.001). In addition, there was a moderate positive correlation between the delivered information index and the time spent on the informed consent process, as well as between the patient-physician relationship and the time spent on the informed consent process (r=0.52; r=0.40, respectively). The study emphasized the lack of communication between patients and physicians, the limitation of information on treatment risks, adverse effects, and alternative treatment options. © 2023 The Beryl Institute. All Rights Reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.35680/2372-0247.1768
dc.identifier.endpage48en_US
dc.identifier.issn2372-0247
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85176432333en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage42en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.35680/2372-0247.1768
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14034/1626
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe Beryl Instituteen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPatient Experience Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectcomprehension; Informed consent; patient experience; patient rightsen_US
dc.titleInformed consent in surgical practice with patients' experiences: A cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
1626.pdf
Boyut:
190.45 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu