Yazar "Üçvet, Ahmet" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 5 / 5
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Chest wall resection for lung cancer: A 12-year experience in a single center(European Respiratory Soc Journals Ltd, 2021) Üçvet, Ahmet; Batıhan, Güntug; Yazgan, Serkan; Ceylan, Kenan Can; Gürsoy, Soner; Kaya, Şeyda Örs[Abstract Not Available]Öğe Iterative surgical resections in non-small cell lung cancer(Termedia Publishing House Ltd, 2021) Üçvet, Ahmet; Yazgan, Serkan; Samancılar, Özgür; Gürsoy, Soner; Erbaycu, Ahmet Emin; Kömürcüoğlu, BernaIntroduction: We reviewed our surgical preferences and the prognosis for recurrent and second primary tumors in patients who underwent surgical treatment for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Aim: We report our experience with patients undergoing iterative pulmonary resection for lung cancer. Material and methods: Among patients who underwent anatomical resection for primary NSCLC, those who underwent a second surgical resection between 2010 and 2020 due to recurrent or second primary tumor were included in the study. Operative mortality, survival, and prognostic factors were investigated. Results: In total, 77 cases were included: 31 (40.3%) underwent the second resection for the recurrent disease and 46 (59.7%) underwent the second resection for the second primary tumor. Postoperative mortality occurred in 8 (10.4%) patients. All patients with postoperative mortality were in the group that underwent thoracotomy in both surgical procedures. The 5-year survival rate was 46.5%. The 5-year survival of those operated on for recurrent or second primary tumor was 32.8% and 51.1%, respectively (p = 0.81). The 5-year survival rate was 68.8% in patients under the age of 60 years, while it was 27.5% in patients aged 60 years and above (p = 0.004). The 5-year survival was 21.8% in patients with an interval of 36 months or less between two operations and 72.2% in those with a longer interval (p = 0.028). Conclusions: Our study shows that survival results similar to or better than primary NSCLC surgery can be obtained with lower mortality if more limited resections are performed via video-assisted thoracic surgery, especially in young patients. In addition, the prognosis is better in patients with an interval of more than 36 months between two operations.Öğe Iterative surgical resections in non-small cell lung carcinoma(European Respiratory Soc Journals Ltd, 2021) Üçvet, Ahmet; Yazgan, Serkan; Samancılar, Özgür; Gürsoy, Soner; Erbaycu, Ahmet Emin; Kömürcüoğlu, Berna[Abstract Not Available]Öğe Surgical and survival outcomes of sleeve lobectomy after neoadjuvant theraphy in lung cancer: With group of 265 patients(European Respiratory Soc Journals Ltd, 2021) Ceylan, Kenan Can; Üçvet, Ahmet; Arabacı, Bengisu; Yazgan, Serkan; Gürsoy, Soner[Abstract Not Available]Öğe Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and bilobectomy versus open thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer: Mortality and survival(Baycinar Medical Publ-Baycinar Tibbi Yayincilik, 2022) Üçvet, Ahmet; Yazgan, Serkan; Samancılar, Özgür; Türk, Yunus; Gürsoy, Soner; Erbaycu, Ahmet EminBackground: In this study, we aimed to evaluate patients who had non-small cell lung cancer and underwent resection, to investigate our tendency to prefer video-assisted thoracic surgery or open thoracotomy, and to compare 30-and 90-day mortalities and survival rates. Methods: Between January 2013 and January 2019, a total of 706 patients (577 males, 129 females; mean age: 61.9 +/- 8.6 years; range, 17 to 84 years) who underwent lobectomy or bilobectomy due to primary non-small cell lung cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups as operated on through video-assisted thoracic surgery and through open thoracotomy. The 30-and 90-day mortality rates and survival rates were compared. Results: Of the patients, 202 (28.6%) underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery and 504 (71.4%) underwent open thoracotomy. Lobectomy was performed in 632 patients (89.5%) and bilobectomy was performed in 74 patients (10.5%). Patients who were chosen for video-assisted thoracic surgery were statistically significantly older, did not require any procedure other than lobectomy, did not receive neoadjuvant therapy, had a small tumor, and did not have lymph node metastases. The 30-and 90-day mortality rates in the video-assisted thoracic surgery and open thoracotomy groups were 1.8% vs. 2% and 2.6% vs. 2.5%, respectively. The five-year survival rates of video-assisted thoracic surgery and open thoracotomy groups were 74.1% and 65.2%, respectively (p>0.05). The 30-and 90-day mortality and five-year survival rates were 2.1%, 2.6%, and 73.5% in the video-assisted thoracic surgery group and 2.1%, 2.1%, and 68.5% in the open thoracotomy group, respectively, indicating no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: Throughout the study period, video-assisted thoracic surgery was more preferred in patients with advanced age, in those who had a small tumor, who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy, did not have lymph node metastasis, and did not require any procedure other than lobectomy. In the video-assisted thoracic surgery and open thoracotomy groups, 30-and 90-day mortality and five-year survival rates were similar. Based on these findings, both procedures seem to be acceptable in this patient population.